Are Horseshoe and JollyRogers taking this bet? YOU decide!

[DogRockets]

Fellow bums - we need your help. This may be the most important poll you've voted on since the last poll I posted.

I am well known for my ability to say no to a cigar purchase. @Horseshoe and I have had an on-again/off-again bet where I won't make any cigar purchases until xx/xx/xxxx date. Loser has to give a cigar of winner's choice to them from loser's collection.

I would have won all previous bets but @Horseshoe cheats and can't be trusted. And now @JollyRogers wants in on the action. But this time I'm making it a fair bet:

Bet - DogRockets won't purchase* another cigar until the Tatuaje Monsters Hyde release this fall. Winner gets a cigar of their choice from loser's collection. Horseshoe and JollyRogers don't think I'll last but I know I will.

So cigarbum - should @Horseshoe and @JollyRogers agree to this bet? YOU decide!!!








* exemptions from the term "purchase" are: Tat 2015 TAA release, any Tat TAA previous release, any Tat Monster of any size, any B&M sticks, or anything DogRockets is already committed to buying as of the time of this poll (yes Brent that includes the Jericho Hills you're selling me).

[Horseshoe]

There should be NO Exemptions! A bet is a bet, straight up.

[DogRockets]

There should be NO Exemptions! A bet is a bet, straight up.

Sounds like someone has sour grapes about losing this bet!

[droy1958]

I think you should send me a couple cigars since I voted. Send me a picture of your inventory (the good stuff) since I took the time to vote even though I had to type this with tired and sore fingers.....

[Horseshoe]

Sounds like someone has sour grapes about losing this bet!

I demand new options to be added. We take the bet straight up no exemption. And last option should be: why bother with another poll, DogRockets will lose, just pay up now to prevent another poll on a ruling.

[Branzig]

I demand new options to be added. We take the bet straight up no exemption. And last option should be: why bother with another poll, DogRockets will lose, just pay up now to prevent another poll on a ruling.

I'm going to second the no exemptions part....Betting with some fixed rules is a little "riggy"

[DogRockets]

I'm going to second the no exemptions part....Betting with some fixed rules is a little "riggy"

Some history. Last time Brent and I bet I had already agreed to buy some cigars from him in a split. I paid after the bet began and he claimed he won. Heavily disputed and unbelievably shady by Brent. This time he can't cry wolf later on.

[Horseshoe]

Some history. Last time Brent and I bet I had already agreed to buy some cigars from him in a split. I paid after the bet began and he claimed he won. Heavily disputed and unbelievably shady by Brent. This time he can't cry wolf later on.

False. You purchased sticks from a B&M, some monsters, and something else. These were all purchased by yourself. Their was proof provided by many other people. The first bet that you lost was lost while you were on in New Orleans and you purchased sticks from a B&M. Both bets were straight up with no exemptions. Me 2, You 0. Back to back bet champ!

[JollyRogers]

I demand new options to be added. We take the bet straight up no exemption. And last option should be: why bother with another poll, DogRockets will lose, just pay up now to prevent another poll on a ruling.

I second this motion!

[jp1979]

Absolutely no exemptions. That's a pretty broad list of would be outs. I would say if anything you won't buy any Tats until the Hyde release but that would be setting yourself up for failure.