-
Bummin' Around

Originally Posted by
CoachDread
So I'm still relatively new here, but I try to be active and I do my best to read most of the new threads as well as perusing quite a few of the older threads. In many of them I see the recurring advice that if you don't like a cigar, put a couple/few of them in storage for 6 months, a year, decade, whatever, and then try it again. I previously bought in to this and then after seeing this advice given again I wondered...why? Not the why of resting, as I know this can alter flavor and can make a good stick great and a bad stick tolerable...but why waste your time on a cigar you really didn't enjoy when there are SO many others out there to try? Wouldn't it make more sense to just move along, find something you really enjoy now and put more of those away to see if they turn into something really spectacular?
Yes the majority move along, people that arent particularly impressed with a release or blend usually off load them in sales, bombs or trades. Your question really segues into a larger aging discussion which could go on for days. So...great post!
Imo, short term aging can bring a sleeper to life (1-2 years), long term aging will smooth out the rough edges (tannins, ammonia). Its difficult to tell which smokes are going to be the best candidates and most people just go on proven track record.
Ive gotten the most out of aged Habanos but some NCs have been really good too. One thing Ive noticed is that a lot of my nicaraguan broadleafs arent aging so great, these were full bodied smokes that seemed like great candidates but for whatever reason just didnt hold up over 2 years. Its tough to predict.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 3 Likes
-
Moderator

Originally Posted by
Merovius
Yes the majority move along, people that arent particularly impressed with a release or blend usually off load them in sales, bombs or trades. Your question really segues into a larger aging discussion which could go on for days. So...great post!
Imo, short term aging can bring a sleeper to life (1-2 years), long term aging will smooth out the rough edges (tannins, ammonia). Its difficult to tell which smokes are going to be the best candidates and most people just go on proven track record.
Ive gotten the most out of aged Habanos but some NCs have been really good too. One thing Ive noticed is that a lot of my nicaraguan broadleafs arent aging so great, these were full bodied smokes that seemed like great candidates but for whatever reason just didnt hold up over 2 years. Its tough to predict.
I agree, this is still one of my favorite topics, since it still seems so much more art than science. Plus it takes so long to learn from experience, so I am always interested in other people's first hand knowledge.
And that's really interesting about the broadleafs. With my almost nonexistent expertise I've been thinking that stronger/fuller means better aging potential.
I know you keep really good notes, so are there any standout NCs that have aged well for you, or not so well? I've got a bunch of boxes now dedicated to a 3+ year aging plan, but maybe there are some cigars in my humis that I should sample soon.
"You can imagine where it goes from here." - Maude
"He fixes her cable?" - The Dude
"Don't be fatuous, Jeffrey." - Maude
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Royal Bum
Z

Originally Posted by
Cardinal
I agree, this is still one of my favorite topics, since it still seems so much more art than science. Plus it takes so long to learn from experience, so I am always interested in other people's first hand knowledge.
And that's really interesting about the broadleafs. With my almost nonexistent expertise I've been thinking that stronger/fuller means better aging potential.
I know you keep really good notes, so are there any standout NCs that have aged well for you, or not so well? I've got a bunch of boxes now dedicated to a 3+ year aging plan, but maybe there are some cigars in my humis that I should sample soon.
Taking into consideration that Habanos age best, I would think that non-broadleaf would age better.
I have zero aging experience so take this with a grain of salt. But I can't recall a Habanos Maduro. As usual please correct me if I'm wrong.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Rail Yard Prophet

Originally Posted by
Brimy
Z
Taking into consideration that Habanos age best, I would think that non-broadleaf would age better.
I have zero aging experience so take this with a grain of salt. But I can't recall a Habanos Maduro. As usual please correct me if I'm wrong.
Cohiba makes the "Maduro 5."
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Administrator

Originally Posted by
stonecutter2
Cohiba makes the "Maduro 5."
If I recall correctly, the 5 signifies that's the wrapper has already been aged for 5 years prior to rolling.
"Hate, it has caused a lot of problems in the world, but has not solved one yet."
― Maya Angelou
Go Vols!
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes