Bruck
07-03-2017, 08:17 PM
A buddy visited the Nat Sherman store in NYC recently, and brought me back a cigar and some pipe tobacco. The cigar had excellent flavor, but was a little lacking in the burn department - perhaps it needed to convalesce a bit in a cedar-lined box.
The pipe tobacco he chose for me was Nat Sherman 536 English Empire. Overall I'm really diggin it; here's the formal review:
Appearance - your basic coarse ribbon cut, mix of lights and darks including Cavendish.
Tin note: good - the Latakia is evident.
I used a gravity fill with light tamping. Pipe is a cheap briar with thin walls but a nice big bowl.
Initial light: could really taste the latakia and burleys, but it also had a sweet licorice note, even though it's not an aro.
Mid bowl: flavors melded pretty well, a very clean English, and the licorice abated but was still there.
Bottom of the bowl - about the same as mid bowl, getting slightly damp, required a couple relights.
Overall, I'm quite pleased with this blend. If I were in the market for tobacco, which I'm not bcs I have bales of the stuff, I'd definitely get more.
The pipe tobacco he chose for me was Nat Sherman 536 English Empire. Overall I'm really diggin it; here's the formal review:
Appearance - your basic coarse ribbon cut, mix of lights and darks including Cavendish.
Tin note: good - the Latakia is evident.
I used a gravity fill with light tamping. Pipe is a cheap briar with thin walls but a nice big bowl.
Initial light: could really taste the latakia and burleys, but it also had a sweet licorice note, even though it's not an aro.
Mid bowl: flavors melded pretty well, a very clean English, and the licorice abated but was still there.
Bottom of the bowl - about the same as mid bowl, getting slightly damp, required a couple relights.
Overall, I'm quite pleased with this blend. If I were in the market for tobacco, which I'm not bcs I have bales of the stuff, I'd definitely get more.